Review:
Traditional Contracting
overall review score: 3.5
⭐⭐⭐⭐
score is between 0 and 5
Traditional contracting refers to a conventional method of project delivery where design and construction phases are separated. Typically, an owner hires a design team to create detailed plans and specifications first, followed by soliciting bids from contractors to execute the construction based on these documents. This approach emphasizes clear contractual delineation between design and construction responsibilities, often leading to well-defined scopes but potentially longer project timelines.
Key Features
- Design-bid-build process with separate contracts for design and construction
- Clearly defined scopes for each phase
- Competitive bidding as a primary means of selecting contractors
- Predictable project costs based on detailed initial designs
- Greater owner control over design decisions
Pros
- Established and widely understood process
- Clear contractual responsibilities reduce disputes
- Owner maintains significant control over design decisions
- Potentially competitive pricing through bidding
Cons
- Longer overall project duration due to sequential phases
- Limited flexibility for changes once design is complete
- Potential for increased costs if redesign or change orders occur
- Less collaboration between designers and builders during execution