Review:
Scoping Review Frameworks
overall review score: 4.2
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
score is between 0 and 5
Scoping review frameworks are structured methodologies designed to map the existing literature on a specific topic, identify gaps, and clarify key concepts. They provide a systematic approach to identifying, selecting, and synthesizing relevant studies or data, often used in health sciences, social sciences, and policy research to rapidly assess the breadth of available information and guide future research agendas.
Key Features
- Systematic approach to literature mapping
- Flexible inclusion criteria compared to systematic reviews
- Focus on identifying key concepts, gaps, and evidence trends
- Use of defined stages such as identifying research questions, searching literature, charting data, and collating findings
- Applicability across diverse disciplines
- Often guided by established frameworks like Arksey and O'Malley's or Levac's enhancements
Pros
- Provides a comprehensive overview of existing research on complex topics
- Flexible methodology suitable for exploratory purposes
- Helps identify research gaps and inform future studies
- Facilitates overview of large and diverse data sets efficiently
Cons
- Less detailed than systematic reviews in evaluating study quality
- Can be subject to selection bias if not carefully conducted
- Methodological variations can lead to inconsistencies across reviews
- May require considerable time and resources depending on scope