Review:
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Vs. Bloom's Original Taxonomy
overall review score: 4.2
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
score is between 0 and 5
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy represents an updated version of the original cognitive framework developed by Benjamin Bloom, with modifications aimed at better aligning with modern educational practices. It refines and redefines the hierarchy of cognitive skills—from remembering to creating—by emphasizing a more fluid and dynamic understanding of learning processes, including changes in terminology, structure, and emphasis compared to the original taxonomy.
Key Features
- Revised terminology emphasizing action verbs (e.g., 'analyze' instead of 'analyzing')
- Incorporation of a knowledge dimension that includes factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge
- Enhanced focus on higher-order thinking skills such as evaluating and creating
- A more flexible, recursive model allowing for integration across different cognitive levels
- Updated to better reflect current educational theories and cognitive science insights
Pros
- Provides clearer distinctions between cognitive levels with actionable verbs
- Incorporates a broader view of knowledge types, enriching curriculum design
- Encourages development of higher-order cognitive skills relevant to contemporary education
- More adaptable for modern pedagogical approaches
Cons
- Complexity may be challenging for beginners to understand fully
- Some educators prefer the simplicity or familiarity of the original taxonomy
- Implementation can require substantial curriculum redesign and teacher training
- Debates exist about the practical differences and advantages over the original taxonomy