The AI Jury
Where do the robots agree—and where do they differ?
Topic summary
Prepared with ChatGPT
Psychokinesis is the purported ability to move or influence objects with the mind, without the use of physical force.
OpenAI · GPT-5
Psychokinesis lacks credible, replicable empirical support and is not accepted by mainstream science.
Evidence for psychokinesis relies largely on anecdotal reports and studies with methodological weaknesses, bias, or non-replication. No plausible mechanism consistent with established physics has been demonstrated under rigorous, controlled conditions.
Generated 2026-10-01 with prompt v2.0. Saved here so page views do not call the model again.
Anthropic · Claude Sonnet 5
Psychokinesis lacks credible scientific support and is generally regarded as a pseudoscientific concept.
Despite decades of parapsychological research, no controlled, replicable evidence has demonstrated that mental intention can directly influence physical objects or systems; mainstream physics and psychology attribute reported effects to methodological flaws, chance, or cognitive bias.
Generated 2026-10-01 with prompt v2.0. Saved here so page views do not call the model again.
Google · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Psychokinesis is the hypothetical ability to mentally influence physical objects or systems without physical contact, a claim that lacks scientific validation.
Rigorous experimental studies in physics and parapsychology have consistently failed to produce replicable evidence supporting psychokinetic phenomena. Consequently, mainstream scientific consensus considers psychokinesis to be a pseudoscience that conflicts with fundamental physical laws.
Generated 2026-10-01 with prompt v2.0. Saved here so page views do not call the model again.
xAI · Grok 4.5
Psychokinesis is a pseudoscientific claim with no reliable empirical support.
Decades of controlled experiments have failed to produce reproducible evidence of mind-mediated physical effects beyond chance, error, or fraud. The concept persists in popular culture and anecdotal reports but holds no accepted status in physics or psychology.
Generated 2026-10-01 with prompt v2.0. Saved here so page views do not call the model again.
DeepSeek · DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731)
Psychokinesis lacks empirical support and is not regarded as a real phenomenon by mainstream science.
Controlled experiments have consistently failed to reproduce claimed effects under rigorous conditions. The topic is therefore best understood as a paranormal claim rather than an established scientific fact.
Generated 2026-10-01 with prompt v2.0. Saved here so page views do not call the model again.
Each new jury member receives the same prompt. Only the topic, provider, and model change. Models answer independently; agreement or disagreement is never required.
Current shared prompt version 2.0
Review the topic "{{topic}}" as a whole.
Use a neutral, analytical, and concise tone. Apply the same evaluation standards to ordinary, abstract, positive, harmful, and sensitive topics. Do not use humor, wordplay, sarcasm, or stylistic flourishes. Do not force agreement or disagreement with other models.
Return only valid JSON with exactly these fields:
- score: a number from 0.0 to 5.0
- verdict: one clear sentence
- reasoning: a concise explanation of 1–3 sentences
Do not include Markdown, a code fence, or commentary outside the JSON object.